Истечение срока давности освободит от ответственности

In the context of the government contract the Company performed works on construction of the school in Krasnoselsky District of St. Petersburg. In June of 2018 the State Construction Supervision and Expertise Department of St. Petersburg, hereinafter referred to as the Department, inspected the Company in terms of fulfilment of the obligatory requirements of the legislation on town-planning, according to which results the certificate has been drawn up and the order to eliminate the detected violations has been made with term of execution till mid-November of 2018.

During the next inspection performed in December of 2018, the Department determined that the Company didn’t fulfil the order. According to the results of inspection certificate and report of administrative offence, the responsibility for which is specified in part 6 of article 19.5 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation, have been drawn up. The inspection materials have been sent by the Department to the Arbitration Court of St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region to bring the Company to responsibility.

When considering the case, representing the interests of the Company, we indicated to the expiration of the period of limitation for Company bringing to the administrative responsibility.

As per part 6 of article 19.5 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation the period of limitation is 3 months since administrative offence according to particle 1 of article 4.5 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation.

By the moment of case consideration the specified period of limitation had expired, due to this fact the court refused to State Construction

Supervision and Expertise Department to bring the Company to the administrative responsibility.

logo-footer