In March 2022, in relation to a citizen of Uzbekistan, who worked at the enterprise of our client – Pizzeria “DodoPizza “- a protocol on an administrative offense under Part 2 of Article 18.10 of the Administrative Code was drawn up. The reason for drawing up the protocol was that the employee with a migration…
Our client took out a bank loan but did not repay it on time. At this time, the bank itself went bankrupt, and its loan portfolio was sold to a collection agency. The collectors demanded the return of the loan, and after the client refused to return the debt, they applied to the Vyborgsky District…
The company was charged a small administrative fine for speeding recorded by surveillance cameras by the driver of a company car. A significant time after the payment of the fine, the bailiff of the Boksitogorsk District Department of Bailiffs of the Federal Bailiff Service (FSSP) for the Leningrad Region also collected an enforcement fee from…
The Administration of the Central District of St. Petersburg inspected the premises of our client, which is located in a house recognized as an object of cultural heritage. The client’s premises were used to provide catering services, with part of the space occupied by a kitchen whose windows overlooked a classic St. Petersburg courtyard well….
A company specializing in the provision of services related to the preparation, collection, and submission of documents for obtaining licenses in the field of subsoil use, contacted us in connection with the non-payment of services rendered to the State Budgetary Institution “Sports School of the Olympic Reserve of the Kirovsky district of St. Petersburg”. The…
Our client specializing in the supply of chemical products from Finland, in January 2022 filed a request for participation in the tender in the framework of the Procurement Law No. FZ-223. According to the results of the tender in February 2022, the client was recognized as the winner, but in early March the Finnish manufacturer…
The budgetary institution applied to our client for services to prepare the application and collect missing documents to obtain licenses for the use of aquifers. The services were rendered, the client prepared an application, received the necessary documents, and informed the customer on what additional documents should be submitted with the application. The customer did…
The municipal enterprise ordered our client to reevaluate groundwater reserves. The work was divided into four stages. After our client began providing services in the first stage, the municipal enterprise’s subsoil use license was revoked due to its own fault, making further work impossible, and the contract was terminated. Our client demanded payment for losses…
In case A56-61873/2021, the Arbitration Court of St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region decided to grant our client’s claim for unjust enrichment. After the litigation, we appealed to the court with the requirement of reimbursement of court costs, including expenses for extrajudicial expertise. The court of first instance awarded the cost of legal services from…
In the context of the government contract the Company performed works on construction of the school in Krasnoselsky District of St. Petersburg. In June of 2018 the State Construction Supervision and Expertise Department of St. Petersburg, hereinafter referred to as the Department, inspected the Company in terms of fulfilment of the obligatory requirements of the legislation…
